I tried to write this article when I first heard about Daredevil’s cancellation, but it quickly became clear that I needed a little time to cool off and collect my thoughts. I was, quite simply, too angry to put any coherent words to paper (and anyone who’s seen my Twitter will know I did not take the news well.) I’m choosing to preface this article by warning you that I am completely biased on this subject. Daredevil is one of my favourite TV shows of all time and Karen Page is my favourite female character of all time. I’m currently in the middle of rewatching season three with my parents, so the show is very present in my mind right now. All of these factors combined led to me being, like so many others, completely distraught when I heard the news. It’s a tough blow. Season three of Daredevil reached wide critical acclaim and completely revitalised the series, solidifying Daredevil’s place as the strongest of Netflix’s Marvel shows. So, why has it been cancelled?
Well, many fans quickly pointed the finger at Disney’s upcoming streaming service – Disney+. After the recent cancellations of Iron Fist and Luke Cage, rumours of possible tension between Netflix and Marvel arose. Many theorised that the cancellations were due to struggles over contract negotiations. Perhaps Disney wanted to come out of the gates running as a new and upcoming streaming service, and no longer wanted to be generating a profit for its primary competition. Nonetheless, fans hoped Daredevil would still be safe from the dubbed “Disney Purge” due to its commercial success and its higher level of critical acclaim than Netflix’s other Marvel shows.
To the fans frustration, both Iron Fist’s and Luke Cage’s second (and now final) seasons ended on cliff-hangers, leaving no doubt that their cancellations came as a shock to the creators. It wasn’t as much of a surprise to fans however, as Luke Cage and Iron Fist especially, were two of the least successful Marvel/Netflix creations (although I would personally still defend Luke Cage season 2 till my dying breath… and the first half of season one.) Many wrote the cancellations off due to the shows’ lack of widespread popularity, remaining hopeful that fan favourites like Daredevil would remain untouched. Some fans even speculated that Luke Cage and Danny Rand might still live on in a joint Heroes for Hire series, which would suit the family-friendly branding of Disney+. However, now that Daredevil has been axed also, fans are left to assume that Disney is in fact purging all of its content from competing streaming platforms. This would indicate that Netflix’s remaining Marvel shows, Jessica Jones and The Punisher, are likely to get the chop shortly after the release of their upcoming seasons.
It seems like a clear-cut case for Disney being the one responsible for Daredevil’s cancellation – or so I thought. Fans derived an opposing theory from a recent tweet from Daredevil’s Co-Executive Producer, Sam Ernst. The tweet in question read “Had a last lunch yesterday with the Daredevil writers. Sushi provided by our Captain, @erikoleson. Marvel execs there too, just as stunned as we were. More than lunch, really: a wake. A show gets cancelled, all those characters we love die. Why I hate my job. Why I love it, too.” If Disney cancelled Daredevil, then surely the Marvel Executives would be aware of the show’s cancellation. There is, of course, rumoured tension between the Marvel film creators and the Marvel TV creators – so perhaps this is simply a case of miscommunication between separate branches of Marvel. However, it’s also possible that it was actually Netflix that cancelled Daredevil, not Disney.
Time and time again, Netflix has demonstrated its prioritisation for cheap, profitable projects over more expensive higher-quality projects (see Sense8 and The Get Down). Netflix may not have wanted to pay increasing licencing costs to Disney, especially now that Disney is rolling out its new streaming service in direct competition to Netflix. I’m honestly not sure I want to believe this theory, and it’s not because I don’t think it’s possible; it’s because I’d hate to see Daredevil cancelled over something so arbitrary, so impersonal.
You see, I can understand if a show is cancelled due to low quality, low viewership or extortionate production costs – at least these reasons are in some way a reflection on the show itself. Daredevil’s cancellation is a by-product. It’s the result of Disney and Netflix’s refusal to compromise, not even for the sake of their joint creation – which neither could have made without the other’s help in the first place. Maybe the cancellation is a result of Netflix deciding Daredevil isn’t worth its cost anymore; maybe it’s that simple. Maybe it’s because Disney thinks they don’t need Netflix to create content for them anymore (even though Marvel originally went to Netflix because it could create far darker content than Marvel could – which is very much still a factor under ‘family-friendly’ Disney’s reign.)
I’d say Disney has more motivation to pull the plug on Daredevil than Netflix does, but there’s enough implication of Netflix being the true culprit for me to stay open-minded. Netflix certainly has a history of axing critically acclaimed shows out of the blue, so I wouldn’t put it past them. Either way, the decision had nothing to do with the fan’s wishes or the quality of the content they were putting out. It had nothing to do with the hard work of the cast and crew, who deserve a proper send-off. At the end of the day, Daredevil’s cancellation is a harsh lesson and reminder of how truly brutal this industry can be.
The most recent episode of All American, “The Choice Is Yours,” starts by bringing us back into the world of sports. Honestly, I’d almost forgotten this was a show about football with all the family drama going on recently. That being said, I’m always a sucker for family drama – and this show does it pretty damn well.
What I’m not a sucker for, is love triangles, and the way they treated the Spencer/Olivia/Layla love triangle in this episode was frankly, quite confusing. You see, towards the start of the episode, Olivia didn’t really seem all that interested in Spencer anymore. (I think the ‘hey that guy might be your brother’ thing may have put her off a little.) In a conversation with Layla, she discussed the whole situation. She heavily implied that she knows Layla is into Spencer, saying “we both know that you trying to set me up with Spencer was more about you than it was about me.” Olivia then proceeds to go on a date with a guy she met whilst volunteering at a community event. She does seem a little wary of committing to a new relationship – but I assumed that was more because the whole Spencer thing was super stressful, not because she actually still had feelings for him. However, later in the episode, Olivia witnesses Layla and Spencer kissing and she is completely taken aback. She actually starts crying, which I found odd, given how okay Olivia seemed about Spencer earlier in the episode. Maybe she was jealous of Spencer, not Layla – I can’t be the only one who’s noticed Olivia and Layla’s chemistry… Or maybe I just missed something.
Speaking of Layla and Spencer kissing, it seems like Layla is sick of putting up with Asher’s lies. I’m honestly not sure if she kissed Spencer because she has actual feelings for him, or just out of frustration with her relationship troubles with Asher. I’m also not sure which option the show wants me to be rooting for – if it’s the first, they’re not doing a very good job. Either way, I’m sure the aftermath will be complicated. If Asher’s lies are her only real issue with him, then she may be happy to know that Asher has started to open up to his friends about his financial struggles – that’s got to be a step in the right direction.
After fighting with Jordan all episode, Asher finally told his best friend his secret. Jordan had been understandably passive aggressive around Asher, due to the previous episode’s revelation that Olivia and Asher had slept together. Jordan believed that Asher had taken advantage of Olivia’s mental state at the time, but after Asher confronts Jordan about his attitude, Asher reveals that he had also been struggling at the time and that they were both equally drunk (and equally ashamed once they sobered up.) The two boys were able to reconcile – as if these two could stay mad at each other for a whole episode. I’m not saying gay but… As a gay myself, I have the right to say gay if I want to say gay – that’s how that works. They did show Jordan flirting with a random girl this episode though, so I’ll say bi instead and leave it at that. Is it unrealistic of me to hope either Jordan and Asher or Layla and Olivia get together at some point? Probably, but I’m going to hold out hope anyway.
The one lesbian romance All American does have is still going strong, so at the moment, I’m more than happy with that. We see Coop and Patience looking quite cosy towards the start of this episode. Spencer and Patience chat about their mutual concern for Coop, who is still working with Shawn – who’s into some shady stuff. Spencer repeatedly expresses his concerns to Coop herself throughout this episode, pointing out that it’s not just her in danger – it’s him and his family too. Coop, however, is too close to Shawn (and too financially desperate) to cut him out of her life. She finds out this episode that Shawn has a (really cute) daughter, and they have an honest conversation about the dangers of what they do. Shawn tells her that he doesn’t have much choice, saying, “you’re playing yourself if you think people like us get the same shots as other people – cause if we did, I’d be out.” On so many other shows, Shawn would be made out to be a total bad guy who’s manipulating Coop for his own gain. All American’s approach is far more powerful. Coop isn’t a gullible idiot – she’s working with Shawn for a reason. He’s actually a pretty compassionate guy, and it’s really our main character, Spencer, who’s looking at the situation in black and white.
Another refreshingly complex relationship explored in this episode was Layla’s relationship with her father. When her father returned with a young girlfriend on his arm last episode, I figured we’d probably see the same old “teenage girl is angry at her father for dating hot new young chick – who is probably a ditsy gold-digger” storyline. At the start of this episode, I still thought that’s where it was going, but it turned out to be a lot more nuanced than that. I won’t get too deep into it, but Layla’s father’s girlfriend turned out to be pretty cool, and her father turned out to be… less cool? They didn’t completely villainise the father though. Layla was originally angry, but, in the end, he admitted to his mistakes openly and honestly and the two shared a particularly emotional scene where they bonded over the loss of Layla’s mother. All episode, Layla sought validation for her not wanting her father to be in a new relationship. She tried to find someone to blame – some sort of conspiracy to break the two apart. Although some of her reasons for suspicion were valid, at the end of the day, there wasn’t anyone to blame, and I really enjoyed watching her come to this point of realisation.
Well, that’s a wrap for this week’s episode of All American. In future, all I can ask is that they continue to surprise me – and that they maybe turn the love triangle down a notch. As a general rule, an extra sprinkling of gay can never hurt, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised with the depth of Coop’s character so far, so far be it from me to complain. If All American keeps it up, I can see the show turning into quite the success.
Robert Redford and Sissy Spacek in The Old Man & the Gun (2018)
No, I’m not kidding. It was a rather unfortunate time for a blackout, but of all the films that could have been interrupted, I’m glad it was The Old Man and the Gun. (My heart goes out to those watching A Star is Born or Widows at the time). I would have been quite happy to have watched the rest of The Old Man and the Gun at the time, but I’m not sure it’s worth the effort to go back and finish the film now. I have no desire to rewatch the first half, so I’ll probably give this one a miss.
I’m not going to pretend I have any right the judge the film as a whole. Even though I have a feeling I know how the rest might play out, it would be a tad unfair. I do however think that my lack of desire to finish the film is a good indication of a few key issues.
It wasn’t a bad film by any means. From what I saw, it was pretty good. Great acting, great directing, the loveliest soundtrack… But it was very leisurely in general. That made the film relaxing and easy to watch, but it also meant I wasn’t particularly invested in anything going on. I watched the film to see some quirky bank robberies, but most of the quirky bank robberies I got in the first half of the film was stuff I’d already seen in the trailer.
I did still enjoy the quirky bank robberies though. In fact, this film had me seriously entertaining a potential future in robbing banks. For the record, I’m not going to, but The Old Man and the Gun made it out to be one of the simplest things in the world. Yes, the simplicity was what made the film entertaining, but there was a brief moment where I was sitting there going “wow casual bank robbery actually seems pretty fun.” I’m not sure whether that’s a positive or a negative about the film – probably a negative. I suppose I didn’t get to see what happened to the main character in the end. It did seem to be leading up to his eventual capture, but where I left it, it all seemed like quite the breeze.
I also had a few issues with the editing – it really pulled me out of the film at times. First of all, they went overboard on the film grain. When the film cut out, the people around me immediately commented on how old the film quality looked; that was their first takeaway. Whilst excessive film grain may be a valid aesthetic choice, when its distracting audiences from the film itself, (and it was certainly distracting me) I’d say it’s too much. There were a few minor editing choices that bugged me at times – often cutting away too quickly from a scene and overly choppy in dialogue scenes. In a more action-packed film, this probably would have slipped by unnoticed, but it just doesn’t fit the slower pacing of The Old Man and the Gun’s leisurely flow.
The Old Man and the Gun has some really strong elements. Robert Redford is perfectly charming in the role of Forrest Tucker and Sissy Spacek’s character, Jewel, comes pretty close. Watching the two interact and grow closer was a lovely experience, and the soft score in the background was a perfect touch. That being said, the film felt like it was getting distracted along the way, spending far too long setting up details of the police search and Tucker’s accomplices – without building up any actual tension. Perhaps if I had seen the entirety of the film my opinion would be different. Perhaps the second half of the film is well worth all the painfully slow build-up but, as it currently stands, I don’t think I will be going out of my way to see what happens next.
When I heard about the Coen Brothers latest film, The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, I couldn’t wait for a chance to watch it. I wasn’t sure what it was going to be, but I was expecting it to be good. What I got was unexpected, but certainly still good. I’m not sure I could say I enjoyed the film, but it was fascinating nonetheless. Incredible writing, directing, acting… the whole shebang. The finished product is an anthology of unrelated short films set in the Wild West. As a whole entity, The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is both thought-provoking and realistically bleak. Each individual chapter reflects these elements to varying extents, through wonderfully innovative means.
The first chapter, “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs” follows Buster Scruggs himself – a charismatic, good-spirited, yet ruthless outlaw. From its Ferris Bueller-esque narration, stylish fight scenes and a cheerful musical number to top it all off, this chapter is effortlessly entertaining. It deviates from the usual dashing hero cliché in a dark twist where Buster proves that he isn’t nearly as invincible as he pretends to be. “The Ballad of Buster Scruggs” is a bold and brilliantly comical start to the film.
“Near Algodones” takes a darker path, starring James Franco as a bank robber who narrowly escapes his sentencing. This tension-laden chapter explores the harsh course of Western justice and the mindset of a broken outlaw as he nonchalantly yields to his ironic yet inevitable fate.
“Meal ticket” balances its disturbing brutality with its eccentric flair. This chapter stars Liam Neeson as a travelling entertainer, with Harry Melling as his crowd-magnet actor with no limbs. It explores the mechanics of their relationship and sheds a satirical light on the money-hungry entertainment industry in its earliest forms. “Meal ticket” is an intriguing story, that gradually descends into the harsh brutality of the truly desperate.
The fourth chapter, “All Gold Canyon,” is a refreshingly simple narrative that relieves some of the tension from the previous two chapters. Inspired by Jack London’s short story, this chapter follows a gold digger who ventures to a picturesque canyon in an obsessively systematic search for a gold vein. His precision and hard work is threatened by a man shadowing his search, but his passion gives him the final edge. Undoubtedly the most optimistic chapter in the film, “All Gold Canyon” highlights the rich rewards of persistence and strategy, with some beautiful imagery and underlying themes of mankind’s destruction of nature on the side.
The next chapter, “The Gal Who Got Rattled” is an adaptation of Stewart Edward White’s 1901 short story of the same name. It stars Zoe Kazan as a young woman travelling along the Oregon Trail with her brother in search of a better life. However, when the brother meets a sudden death on the trail, the young woman is left to pay off his debts and fend for herself. The chapter becomes a story about a romance of convenience that starts growing into something more. At its conclusion, the travellers’ overcompensated fear of the ‘savage’ Native Americans works against them in a bleak and bitterly ironic ending.
The final chapter, “The Mortal Remains” is a tense, intriguing story that makes for a perfect thought-provoking conclusion. It follows the journey of five travellers sharing a stagecoach – an Englishman, an Irishman, a Frenchman, a lady and a trapper. It’s a simple enough premise, but it takes a sinister turn when the Englishman and the Irishman reveal that they are bounty hunters, escorting their deceased bounty to its final resting place. This revelation disturbs the other carriage members, as the Englishman’s wording seems to imply that they are in fact the real bounties being ferried. The Englishman continues to describe his work with the Irishman, referring to themselves as “harvesters of souls.” Though left ambiguous, it is inferred that the three travellers are departed souls being escorted from this world by the Englishman and the Irishman, who are representations of the Grim Reaper and Death respectively.
The Ballad of Buster Scruggs subverts Hollywood’s glamourized depictions of the Wild West, instead shining a light on the era’s darker nature. This thought-provoking anthology is not for casual viewing, and might not appeal to everyone as a result. But for those who do enjoy the dark and disturbing, The Ballad of Buster Scruggs’s satirical and profound exploration of the Wild West is definitely worth a watch.
Going into these the last five episodes of The Haunting of Hill House, my main questions were: what’s up with the red door, what really happened to the children’s mother, and why is the house haunted in the first place? Two of the three were answered throughout these next five episodes, which leaves room for another season if they decide to make one.
Before I talk about the individual episodes, I’ll just start by addressing the show and these last five episodes, as a whole. Now, I’m probably the last person to finish this series. At first, I just thought it was just because I’m a bit of a wimp but, when I got to these last five episodes, I found myself moving through them much faster. They follow directly on from one another, which made it much harder to stop watching. The first five were more self-contained, and I actually liked taking a break between episodes to just sit with each individual character for a while.
These last five episodes have really made me appreciate the slower pacing in the first five – and I don’t mean that in a bad way. It was only when all the children came together that I realised just how much depth each character has. They have that depth because the writers took the time to flesh out each character individually, and the last five episodes work so incredibly well as a result.
I forgot to mention in my review of episodes 1-5 how much I love this show’s opening titles. I’m a big fan of opening titles in general. I don’t know if that weird thing to be a fan of, but this show’s titles is one of my favourites. If you read my previous review, then you’ll know that the show’s pilot didn’t leave too much of an impression on me at first, but you know what did? That’s right – the opening titles. They are very spooky and atmospheric and in my official reviewer opinion, they are, in fact, pretty rad. They’re probably half the reason I came back to the show in the first place and I simply couldn’t do another review without saying so.
Now let’s get into the individual episodes. Strap in – this is a long one.
Timothy Hutton, Elizabeth Reaser, Anthony Ruivivar, and Kate Siegel in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
In episode 6, “Two Storms,” our main characters are finally all in the one place – thanks Nell. The episode is a well-needed standstill after the harrowing “Bent-Neck Lady,” as the characters come together to mourn Nell. Now we finally have a chance to see all the messed-up family dynamics clashing together at full force. The characters reflect on their memories of Nell, frustrating one another with their conflicting defence mechanisms.
Steve interrogates their father in search of some much-needed answers, and they attempt to piece together what really happened to Nell. Steve believes Nell must have inherited some sort of mental illness from their mother, whilst Luke maintains Nell’s death wasn’t a suicide – that it was the result of something supernatural.
Theo confronts Shirley, revealing she took Steven’s money. Shirley’s husband admits he also took the money and Shirley, who somehow held herself together throughout the first five episodes, finally had the breakdown I’d been waiting to see. Later in the episode, Shirley is shocked to find her husband and Theo in close quarters. It appears as though Theo is attempting to kiss Shirley’s husband, which doesn’t make sense. It isn’t explained in this episode, but I expect it will be the source of some drama to come.
In a discussion with Luke, the father agrees that the house had somehow killed Nell. Luke pushes him to confirm that their mother hadn’t killed herself either but he refuses. Steven joins in the argument, also appearing to believe their father is still hiding information from them about that night.
There was little new information provided in the flashbacks this episode, which simply told the story of one particularly stormy night in the house where Nell goes missing. The father sees an unexplained ghostly apparition of his wife whilst they search for Nell, starting to hint at the mysteries to come centred around the children’s mother.
This episode was a perfect opportunity for the characters to reconcile and express their struggles to one another, allowing them to begin moving forward – and hopefully bring them closer to finding out what actually happened to the mother.
Michiel Huisman, and Oliver Jackson-Cohen in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
In many ways, episode seven, “Eulogy,” feels like the second instalment of “Two Storms,” directly following on from both the flash-back timeline and modern-day timeline of the previous episode. Like “Two Storms,” episode seven is more focused on the progression of family relationships than it is on adding much to the haunted house plotline.
The supernatural side of the story is mostly reflected throughout the flashbacks – which shift attention back to the mysterious room with the red door. At one point, the father vents out his growing frustrations with the house by unsuccessfully attempting to force his way through the door, but it remains inexplicably impenetrable. The house is full of water damage after the storm in the previous episode, which pushes back the repairs considerably – as if the house is refusing to let the family leave.
We also see signs of the mother reaching a breaking point, when the father wakes up to see her pressing a knife to his throat. The father also notices her drawings of their future “forever house” have a remarkably similar layout to Hill House. Later in the episode, one of the water-damaged walls is demolished to reveal a decaying human skeleton – which is a good indicator that there is some sort of backstory for the house’s supernatural happenings. Whether this backstory will ruin the ‘spooky’ factor of the house remains to be seen, but this discovery (along with the mother’s descent into hysteria) shows a definite step towards finding some much-needed answers.
In the modern-day timeline, the episode focuses on the father, Hugh, on the day of Nell’s funeral. Throughout the episode, he interacts with each of the children individually, giving the audience an insight into each of the withstanding parent-child relationships. He sees and interacts with a vision of the children’s mother, which he tells Luke about towards the end of the episode, where he implies that she’s just a projection of his grief. Luke also experiences a vision earlier in the episode of Nell at her grave. In their later conversation, Hugh implies that Luke’s vision, unlike his own, was likely real in some sense. Steve was the one with Luke when the vision actually occurred, and he maintained that it was due to some sort of hereditary mental illness – warning Luke that if he wasn’t careful, he would end up like Nell and their mother.
Later in the episode, Luke goes missing along with Shirley’s wallet and Theo’s car, and the others assume the worst. Shirley and Steve go out looking for Luke and back at Shirley’s house, Theo and Hugh find the model of the “forever home” has been destroyed. Theo then experiences a similar vision of Nell to Luke’s.
In this episode, we finally get to see flashbacks of what happened between Hugh and the police on the day after the family fled the house. The episode concludes with the revelation that Hugh found the red door open on the night they ran from Hill House, but he conceals this fact in his statement to the police. I can only assume that the room has something to do with the mother’s death, but I suppose I’ll just have to wait and see.
Elizabeth Reaser and Kate Siegel in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
Now, because I don’t hate myself, I have not watched a single episode of this show at night. Well, I hadn’t, until I watched episode eight, “Witness Marks.” In fact, I watched this episode just before I went to bed – like the idiot I am. I actually thought I was going to get away with it, but the jumpscare of Nell screaming in the car got me… and then the ending really got me.
Anyway, this episode we’re back to Steve, and we finally get more information about what happened between him and his wife – which he had been awfully tight-lipped about up until this point. Steve’s father encourages him to reconcile with his wife, but Steve dismisses him, still holding his father accountable for his mother’s death. He implies that his father may have abused her, as some of her injuries that the police report documented couldn’t have been self-inflicted. Regardless – in keeping with his belief that their family is mentally ill – Steve also blames his father simply because “the one person who was supposed to care about her didn’t do a goddamn thing to get her help.”
Steve tells Hugh that he had a vasectomy right out of college because he never wanted to pass on the family’s mental illness. He had lied about this to his wife, which is what lead to their separations. In turn, Hugh disputes Steve’s ‘mental illness’ theory, telling him the house itself is the real danger. He implies that the house had some personal vendetta against their family in particular and tells Steve the house is especially dangerous for him because of what he wrote in his book. In an effort to convince Steve, Hugh reveals that many of the events Steve wrote as fact simply weren’t possible. A man Steve saw fixing a clock was never there, and the treehouse, which was featured in a number of flashbacks of Steve’s memories, was never there. This discussion occurs as the family continues their search for Luke, who they discover may be on his way to burn down Hill House.
Back at Shirley’s house, we see Shirley’s marriage problems continue after she saw Theo and her husband almost kissing in episode six. Left alone in her home, Shirley hears repeated knocks on her front door, but each time she checks outside, she doesn’t see anyone there. She convinces herself that it’s just kids messing around. When Theo comes back, the two fight about what had really happened with Shirley’s husband. The fight is interrupted by repeated knocking from all over the house. A shaken Shirley still insists its kids stirring up trouble, but Theo dismisses her, saying, “you know it wasn’t.” Both of our sceptics, Shirley and Steve, are therefore forced to face the possibility that their supernatural encounters are in fact real. As we drive closer to the end of the season, these realisations will hopefully help the family become a united front.
Shirley and Theo both see the same apparition of Nell screaming (which frightened me half to death) whilst arguing in the car. Theo breaks down and explains to Shirley how touching Nell’s dead body had made her feel completely empty, as if she were also dead. This scene was probably the highlight of the episode; it was incredibly emotional, and Theo’s descriptions of what death felt like were truly horrifying.
The flashbacks in the episode continue to show the mother’s descent into some sort of madness. We also hear more backstory about the Hill family, who apparently met in a mental asylum – nice.
The episode ends with Luke entering the house, pouring gasoline everywhere and attempting to light in on fire. Oh boy did I have chills. From the moment the house lit up as it had done for Nell, I was a goner. Now, I know I said in my previous review that Luke’s episode wasn’t my favourite, but I’ll admit I’ve grown quite fond of him over the past few episodes – though I’m not sure I realised it until this scene. I was genuinely distraught over the possibility of Luke dying, and if it hadn’t been for John Mulaney’s New in Town airing on TV that night, (like a gift from God himself) I’m not sure I would’ve slept a wink. Any episode that can make me feel that amount emotion is a good one in my book.
Carla Gugino in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
Episode nine, “Screaming Meemies” was the episode that I’d been waiting for. The entire episode occurs in the flashback timeline, showing the mother’s perspective of the events leading up to her death. The mother, Olivia, experiences a vision towards the beginning of the episode, of an adult version of Nell lying dead, with Luke on the floor next to her with a needle in his arm – which was all kinds of disturbing. This vision instils a sense of fear in Olivia for the twins going forward. She tells her husband about the vision, and he assumes it was a dream but she doesn’t seem convinced.
Olivia often sees spirits around the house. One woman disturbs her in particular, Poppy Hill – who, as we learnt last episode, met the house’s original owner in an insane asylum. The two discuss the pain of losing a child, and Poppy describes in vivid detail a dream in which she killed her own child. It’s implied that this ‘dream’ Poppy speaks of may have actually been real. She attempts to manipulate Olivia into violent action against the twins (thereby attempting to ‘save’ them from the darkness of the outside world.) This is when Olivia wakes up with a knife to her husband’s throat.
In another particularly disturbing scene, Olivia speaks to the twins before bed and Nell asks, “what if I dream that you kill me?” Luke follows this with, “and what if I’m so sad and scared of the dark that I put poison in me?” Nell continues with an eerie premonition – “you send us out there to the dark and the dark gets us – a piece at a time, over years and years and years until I’m on a silver table… and Luke is cold and dead on the floor with a needle in his arm, and it was you that killed us because you sent us out there in the dark.” When Nell asks “would you wake us up from a dream like that?” Olivia replies, “of course.” Steve walks in and interrupts her, and the twins aren’t actually there. This vision gives us many answers about Olivia’s mindset at the time. Her visions all indicated that her children needed saving from the pain and darkness in their futures, which is an idea Olivia becomes obsessed with moving forwards.
She bumps up her trip to see her sister out of fear for her mental state, but lies to the family, and simply takes a cab to the nearby motel instead. In a nice piece of foreshadowing, the husband discovers the mould killer has been ineffective on the storm-damaged walls, which had regrown. That night, Olivia takes a cab back to the house. Shirley finds her in the kitchen and notices that something is off. Olivia visits the twins and discovers Luke’s ‘imaginary friend’ Abigail is with them. Olivia invites the three of them to have a tea party with her, and she takes them through into the room with the red door, which lies open. Shirley wakes their father out of concern, and he finds the mould-killer in the kitchen where Olivia made the tea and assumes the worst. He finds the twins beds empty and runs to the room with the red door.
Abigail drinks the tea and starts choking, and Olivia maintains the belief that she’s freeing them from a life of pain. Hugh runs into the room, grabbing his wife by the neck and pushing her against the wall when she objects to him stopping the twins from drinking. This aligns with the injuries on the police report that lead Steve to believe Hugh may have been abusive. When the mother wakes up, most of the children are already in the car. She makes her way to Steve’s room, who Hugh has gone to rescue. Poppy materialises once more, telling Olivia that her husband wants to take the kids away from her into the darkness. Olivia twists the door handle around – which we saw from Steve’s perspective in the first episode – but another ghost distracts her, telling her that the Poppy is lying. When the mother moves away from the door, Hugh escapes with Steve.
When they drive away, Olivia returns to Abigail’s body. Abigail appears as a ghost, and Olivia follows her up the spiral staircase, where Poppy appears once more. Poppy convinces Olivia that she’s dreaming and that when she wakes up, the children will be asleep in their beds. In an attempt to wake up, Olivia jumps. In one final blow to my fragile heart, the episode cuts to the scene where the family first moved into the house, and Olivia insists that her husband must go on (upstairs) without her.
Once again this was an incredible episode, and in no way do I feel that the backstory/reasoning behind the spooky events (as revealed so far) has ruined the show – as I so often feel in horrors.
Victoria Pedretti in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
Onto the finale, “Silence Lay Steadily.” This last episode wasn’t my favourite episode, but that’s not to say I wasn’t impressed. As I addressed in my last review, it’s no easy feat to provide a satisfying conclusion to a horror story. Somehow, this episode managed to wrap up most of the loose ends in an interesting, emotional final hurrah, that gives each character enough screen time to say a proper farewell. The episode provides answers to enough of the remaining mysteries to make all the buildup worthwhile, but it doesn’t drown the audience in too much detail to the point where the show simply isn’t scary anymore. To accomplish all that in an hour of quality television is impressive.
The episode starts with the scene from episode one where Shirley and Nell try to unlock the red door, but this time, we also get to see that Theo was on the other side. She can hear them, but they can’t hear her. This hints at a revelation that occurs later in the episode. We then see Steve with his wife, who is somehow pregnant. Steve is struggling to write a sequel to Hill House, retelling this season’s modern-day timeline – he is up to the part of the story where he and his father arrive at the house looking for Luke. We then follow Steve and Hugh back at that time, climbing up the spiral staircase to the room with the red door, which is locked. When his father turns away, Steve sees the door open, and Luke is inside on the ground. Steve runs through the door and it slams shut behind him.
When Steve is writing the second book, his wife mentions that Luke had died – which was very mean of the show’s writers. Steve says he doesn’t remember what happened after the door closed, that he doesn’t remember getting out of the house or reconciling with his wife or how she got pregnant. Steve realises his wife and everything he’s seeing isn’t real, that he’s actually in the room with the red door. Nicely done writers, you had me fooled for a second. Luke is trapped in a similar dream state to Steve, back in the events of episode four. This is a different version where the girl he went after came back for him. She tries to convince Luke to take drugs with her and he starts to realise something is wrong. Nell appears, pulling him out of the vision in time for him to wake up and see Steve enter the room.
Shirley and Theo enter the house and they both have similar visions. Theo’s depicts her telling her lover about a time her mother had spanked her for throwing a rock through a greenhouse window. She puts on her gloves but she doesn’t remember why, and she doesn’t feel anything when she touches the woman’s skin. Eventually, Nell pulls her out of it and she wakes up. Shirley’s vision is different, revealing new information that had only been hinted about throughout the season – that years ago, she had cheated on her husband with a man she met in a bar.
When the girls wake up, the siblings are all together in the red room and they attempt to resuscitate Luke, to no avail. Luke wakes up in the red room to see his mother, along with a young Nell and Abigail sitting at the table as they did during the tea party. Olivia asks him to join them, but the young Nell warns him not to. Luke tells his mother he doesn’t want to be dead, but Olivia insists that he had been knocking on the red door for years – thus knocking on the door to his own death. Nice metaphor. Nell eventually breaks through and Luke wakes up to see Steve and Theo struggling to open the red door.
The siblings all see the same apparition of Nell, who confirms Shirley’s suspicions that they’d all been in the room before. She describes the room as being the ‘stomach’ of the house, revealing that it had been Theo’s dance studio, her own toy room, Olivia’s reading room, Steve’s gaming room, the family room for Shirley and a tree house for Luke. The siblings use this opportunity to apologise to Nell and say their goodbyes. It’s one of the episodes more touching scenes, but Nell assures them that she’s not dead, that pieces of her are still scattered throughout their lives.
Hugh wakes up to a vision of a decaying Poppy. She threatens him but is stopped and dismissed by Olivia. The parents speak, and Olivia asks him what he was doing all that time away, and he responds, “I was holding the door closed” because he knew “there were monsters on the other side that wanted the rest of [their] family.” Olivia argues the true monsters are the ones in the outside world. She still blames him for taking the children from her, and for their suffering. She insists, “this is our forever house, it always was” and that they would always be safe in it. He asks her to open the red door and to let them go out into the world. She refuses, as she’d be left alone. He offers to stay there with her, as long as she opens the door. She finally agrees, and the children are able to escape.
Steven remains behind with Hugh, who has something more he wishes to reveal. The two observe the scene where Hugh found Olivia dead all those years ago. It turns out the caretakers were there that night, as their daughter had snuck out of her bed. Their daughter is revealed to be Abigail, and they find her dead body on the floor. Abigail’s ghost appears, and Hugh also sees Olivia’s ghost materialise by her body. The caretakes talk Hugh out of burning the house down, saying they would keep Abigail’s death a secret as long as he let them stay on as sole caretakers of the house. After these revelations, Steve and Hugh apologise to each other for the secrets they kept. Hugh says goodbye, leaving the house to Steve as he joins Olivia and Nell in the red room.
In the final scenes, Steve apologies to his wife, and the two reconcile. Shirley tells her husband about the time she cheated on him in hopes that the two can move forward. Theo moves out of Shirley’s house with the help of the girl she’s been seeing, and she throws out her gloves, choosing instead to feel. We see Luke celebrate two years of being clean, and in the background, we hear Steve’s narration of what we can assume is the second book in the making. The caretakers return to Hill House on their deathbeds to be with Abigail, and everything is tied up in a neat little bundle.
The finale didn’t delve too deep into the mechanics of the house, which I actually like. It’s implied that the house feeds on its inhabitants somehow, collecting them as ghosts. It doesn’t explain how this began, simply choosing to focus on the Crain family and their emotional connections, as they were the real draw to the show in the first place. Perhaps they’ll delve into how the house works more in the next season – if there is a next season.
It’s hard to tell how they would proceed with a second season, but there have been talks about potentially exploring other familys’ experiences with Hill House. Creator, Mike Flanagan, released a recent statement stating that he doesn’t feel the need to revisit the Crain family, as he wants to “remember them the way [they] left them, and leave them to their lives.” In some ways this is disappointing; I’ve grown quite attached to these characters over the course of the season, so of course it would be nice to see more of them. But, like Flanagan, I’m perfectly happy to leave them here, safe in the knowledge that the worst of their troubles are behind them.
Another year, another onslaught of cheesy Netflix Christmas films – now this is a tradition I could get used to. Anyone who thinks November is too early to start watching Christmas movies can fight me personally – and yes, that is my professional opinion. But all that aside, let’s get on to the films.
The Holiday Calendar
Kat Graham and Ron Cephas Jones in The Holiday Calendar (2018)
The Holiday Calendar was a solid start for Netflix’s Christmas season, with a good balance of cheesy-goodness, mixed with a heart-warming story that makes for a genuinely decent film.
The film tells the story of a struggling photographer who’s lost her spark, journeying towards finding love and passion once more. Her dissatisfaction with life is clear from the start of the film when a friend of hers returns to town after travelling the world and taking photos. Such a thing Is a distant dream for Abby, who takes photos of children meeting Santa throughout the holiday season. She dreams of opening up her own studio in a building that she can’t afford to lease, and her discussions with her friend about his success only remind her frustrations with her own career.
However, things start to change when Abby’s grandfather, played by This is Us’s Ron Cephas Jones, gives her a Christmas calendar that had once belonged to Abby’s grandmother. Each day leading up to Christmas, a new door of the calendar opens, revealing a toy that somehow predicts Abby’s day.
On the first day, the calendar opens to a pair of toy boot. Later in the day, Abby’s photography friend, Josh, gives her a pair of boots from Italy. Whilst Abby originally chalks this up to a coincidence, she starts to suspect there is something else going on when a similar thing happens on the second day. She finds a Christmas tree toy in the calendar on this second day, and she later gets into a road accident in which a Christmas tree falls of the roof of a car driving by. The car’s driver is immediately likeable and the two share an undeniable chemistry. The guy seemingly falls in love with her after she insults him a couple of times – now that’s the dream. Abby runs into dream-guy again on the third day, on which she finds out he has a daughter (who’s dressed in a nutcracker costume similar to the nutcracker toy she received from the calendar that day). Once again, Abby and dream-guy have a chemistry-laden conversation.
It quickly becomes clear that Abby’s boot-gifting photography friend is secretly in love with her, and a full-fledged love triangle begins to unfold. The fourth day predicts a near-fatal candy cade incident that once again puts her in the path of dream-guy, (no I don’t remember his name) who just happens to be a doctor. He asks her out for dinner, and two continue to go on more and more elaborate dates planned by dream-guy, with the calendar continuing to predict details about each one. She starts to wish she and dream-guy could have a deeper connection, and her attention begins to stray towards her friend instead.
Dream-guy turns out to be not such a dream, making this the most realistic Christmas film I’ve seen in a while. The film gets a little confusing after that. It loses its rhythm a bit and struggles to balance its prioritisation of Abby’s career aspirations with her love life. Abby and her photography friend grow closer, but they lack the chemistry that the film spent so much time developing between Abby and dream-guy. Still, dream-guy is enough of an asshole to make me root for Abby’s friend. The friend at least is a total sweetheart who really cares about her – he just doesn’t have the kind of chemistry with Abby that makes for a great rom-com. Instead, we end up with a good movie, but a fairly mediocre rom-com.
As a whole, this movie is actually pretty decent. Both the acting and the story itself (although cheesy) are surprisingly good, and it’s definitely worth a watch, but I’ll admit it didn’t fill me with the same sense of joy that this next film did…
The Princess Switch
Vanessa Hudgens in The Princess Switch (2018)
If you’re looking for quality filmmaking you’d be better off watching The Holiday Calendar, but if you’re looking for the pinnacle of cheesy romance clichés, then this is the film for you. Basically, a baker and a dutchess – who happen to be identical – run into each other and decide to switch lives, and the two both start to fall in love with someone in the other person’s life. The Princess Switch is silly as you would imagine, but it’s relentlessly sweet and wonderfully rewatchable. Last years A Christmas Prince still holds the top spot in my heart for so-bad-its-good Christmas films, but this one came pretty close.
The premise is that a baker travels to Belgravia with her sous chef and his daughter, to enter an elite Christmas baking competition. This, of course, is where the baker, Stacy, runs into the Duchess of Montenaro, Margaret. Upon realising how similar they look, Margaret pitches the idea of switching places for a few days whilst her fiancé, Prince Edward, is away on a business trip. Stacy agrees because she’s sick of people telling her she needs to be more spontaneous.
During the two days in which they are switched, Stacy starts to fall in love with the prince, Edward, who cancels the business trip he had planned because he wants to get to know the duchess better before they get married. Edward is sweet and charming and he shares Stacy’s love of order and responsibility. Stacy gets herself into many a hilarious situation – most notably where she vaults over a horse in an attempt to mount it. She somehow gets away with blaming most of her suspicious behaviours on cultural differences between Belgravia and Montenaro, which becomes increasingly funny throughout the film. For some reason, the prince buys her act, and the two become closer over discussions about palace politics, in which Edward finds Stacy to be refreshingly opinionated.
While Stacy spends time with the prince, Margaret has a few days of freedom with Stacy’s friend and sous chef, Kevin, and his daughter, Olivia. Olivia quickly detects their ruse when Margaret bluffs her way through their secret handshake. She keeps their secret when she discovers Stacy had asked Margaret to help Olivia get into an elite ballet summer program, jumping at the chance to spend time with royalty. Kevin, on the other hand, remains oblivious to the switch. He is pleasantly surprised to see his close friend throw out Stacy’s tightly-packed itinerary in favour of having some spontaneous fun. Margaret’s laid-back attitude confuses him, and he starts to think that there may be potential for romance between them that he hadn’t seen before.
It’s not hard to imagine how the film plays out from there. Vanessa Hudgens has incredible chemistry with both of her characters’ love interests, elevating the film from your average rom-com into the perfect romantic cliché. The awkward situations Margaret and Stacy find themselves in throughout the film are genuinely funny, and Kevin and Edward’s adorably confused reactions are even better. The Princess Switch is by no means a cinematic masterpiece, but it’s relentless sweet, full of Christmas spirit and must-watch for fans of romantic comedy.
The Christmas Chronicles
Kurt Russell, Darby Camp, and Judah Lewis in The Christmas Chronicles (2018)
The other two films were probably best suited for a girl’s night, but The Christmas Chronicles is more of a classic Christmas film for all the family. It’s definitely the best quality film out of the three, but that doesn’t change the fact it’s my least favourite – but I’m a total sucker for rom-coms so I suppose that makes me biased.
The film focused on a pair of siblings whose family is suffering from the recent loss of their father. The youngest is a girl called Kate, a firm believer in Santa, who records her older brother, Teddy, driving a stolen car with his friends. She uses this as blackmail to convince her brother to help her capture footage of Santa – who the brother decidedly doesn’t believe in. The plan turns out to be a success, with the two observing both Santa and his reindeer on Christmas Eve, to the brother’s complete surprise. They hide in Santa’s sleigh whilst he delivers presents to the street, and he drives off without noticing them.
This leads to a pretty bumpy landing when Santa receives the shock of his life mid-flight, losing his hat and reindeer in the process. The children persuade him to let them help him find his hat and reindeer, (and hence ‘save Christmas’) with the hat apparently being the source of all of Santa’s powers.
The Christmas Chronicles’s version of Santa is notably snarky and generally edgier than your average depiction. He takes the children into a bar where he meets Wendy, played by Crazy Ex-Girlfriend’s Vella Lovell, and he demonstrates his ability to recall details from just about anyone’s childhood. He attempts to use this ability to convince the people in the bar to help him, to which they are all refuse (and are sufficiently freaked out). This starts a bit of a brawl. Someone calls the police, which prompts Teddy to suggest they steal a car and get out of there. Santa agrees, partially because the car had already been stolen by a guy at the bar, but mostly because it was a very nice car – which paints a pretty good picture of this Santa’s priorities.
The three begin tracking down the reindeer, and Kate gets separated from the others when the police start chasing after them. She works on winning over the reindeer’s trust, whilst Teddy and Santa distract the officers. Santa attempts to win over the officers to no avail and is saved by the horde of reindeer running towards them, at Kate’s instruction. Kate manages to rescue Teddy, but Santa gets left behind with the police. The two fly away on the backs of the reindeer, whilst Santa gets thrown in jail.
The rest of the film descends into an enjoyable enough action comedy, featuring a jazzy cellblock musical number with Santa at its forefront. (Yes, you heard me). The siblings become closer throughout the film, giving their poor mother the fright of her life when she sees them hugging towards the end of the film. It’s a solid Christmas movie, but it’s nothing revolutionary. They try to switch up the usual clichés by making Santa a little more laidback, but when it comes down to it, this is still just another movie about saving Christmas and the importance of family. If you’re just looking for a cute film to get you in the mood for Christmas, then this is a pretty good one.
To wrap this all up, I’d say Netflix has done a good job overall getting me into the mood for Christmas. These are three solid films, all with an array of strengths and weaknesses that may or may not make them worth watching, depending on what you’re looking for in a Christmas movie. There’s still more to come from Netflix’s bout of seasonal offerings. A Christmas Prince: The Royal Wedding is set to come out on November 30th, and I for one can’t wait to see the wonderful disaster this film is bound to be.
The Daily Show presenter, Trevor Noah, released his Netflix comedy special, Son of Patricia earlier this week, and it is well worth a watch. The show is ever-entertaining, filled to the brim with insightful anecdotes about tacos, snakes and racism. Noah is a charming performer and expert storyteller, with a calm confidence and a powerful stage presence.
Son of Patricia balances its political conversation with some lighter material, and it’s all equally hilarious. Noah quickly won me over, with an early anecdote expressing his (extremely valid) frustration with the popularity of camping. He plays a confused tourist to the concept of living in harsh conditions for fun – a role he often assumes throughout the show. Noah uses this fresh, yet logical perspective to draw attention to small absurdities in everyday life.
The highlight of the show was Noah’s retelling of his visit to a snake whisperer’s performance in Bali. Maybe it was just because I related to Noah’s realistic amount of caution around snakes (which really shouldn’t be such a weird thing). Noah, being the intelligent person he is, ensured he remained a considerable distance away from the snakes, despite being mocked for his (understandable) fear by the French father and son next to him in the crowd. Noah cleverly draws in the audience as the story builds, showcasing his expertise in the art of effective storytelling. He held me captive right up until the tale’s oh-so-satisfying confusion, in which his fears proved to be completely valid. (Although I’m not sure whether I appreciated that my own fear of snakes was also completely validated. In fact, my fears are now stronger than ever – thanks Trevor.)
Noah’s South African perspective shines throughout the show, as he details his experiences in the US as a foreigner. He presents himself as a newcomer to American customs, most notably in his segment on his first experience with tacos. The comedy is at its strongest when what should have been an ordinary experience is completely turned on its head throughout a series of simple misunderstandings. Not only does this build to a hilariously disastrous climax, but Noah weaves in a few jabs about immigration along the way – specifically about immigrant cuisine. He points out how possessive American culture can be when it comes to its claim on foreign food, stipulating, “I feel like there should be a rule in America that says you can hate immigrants all you want, but if you do, you don’t get to eat their food.” It’s a simple notion, but he hits the nail on the head, creating a perfect analogy for a much bigger issue.
Noah’s politics are never forceful or overly-aggressive. He is merely an observer, cleverly presenting his own experiences with prejudice in a light-hearted manner and leaving the rest for the audience to interpret as they choose. The biggest laughs (from both myself and the live audience) were throughout the segment on Trump’s wall. Noah doesn’t outright attack Trump’s beliefs, he just points out the inconsistencies in his designs and strategies. Noah further stipulates how others could potentially react or even manipulate Trump in response, once again striking a perfect balance between political relevance and sheer hilarity.
Son of Patricia concludes with some final anecdotes about Noah’s mother, Patricia, along with his recent experience with being called the ‘n’ word – which is a surprisingly insightful story. In South African, the slur has an entirely different meaning, and Noah once again demonstrates how a foreign perspective can allow one to cut through to the true nature of an issue.
Noah’s comedy is light-hearted enough to be effortlessly entertaining and topical enough for viewers to take something away from the experience. Son of Patricia demonstrates an expert ability to perform and tell stories in a wonderfully logical fashion. Noah’s intellectual brand of humour is part of an innovative wave of comedy that’s attracting new audiences to the genre. I’m sure fans – new and old – will be quickly queuing up for whatever Noah has in store for the world next – I know I am.
Carla Gugino, Henry Thomas, and Violet McGraw in The Haunting of Hill House (2018)
I originally planned to save my The Haunting of Hill House review for after I had finished the entirety of season one, but I a) have been progressing through the show far slower than initially expected, (hence why this review is coming out a month after the release of the series) and b) have a lot of thoughts I already want to discuss, so here I am.
I’ll preface this by saying I’m not a fan of horror, not just because the genre terrifies me, but also because I rarely find myself satisfied with how they play out in the end. The build-up is always better than the conclusion. It’s very rare that the spooky supernatural events taking place can be thwarted in a logical manner, or in a manner that allows them to retain their ‘scary’ factor. As a result, I tend to avoid the genre as a whole (though I am partial to a good psychological thriller now and then.)
Every rule has its exceptions, and The Haunting of Hill House might just be one of them. Not only is it genuinely scary, but the show has at its foundation something most horrors lack – a strong emotional centre that gives the audiences something to actually root for. On top of this, the show is (so far at least) more of an exploration of the characters’ experiences with the supernatural, rather than them attempting to destroy it somehow or give it a logical explanation when one doesn’t exist. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to learn more about the house’s history, especially if there is some sort of link between all the spooky happenings. That being said, delving too deep into the mechanics of something so abstract does tend to kill it for me; I guess I’ll just have to wait and see.
The family relationships in the show are complex and compelling – almost on par with This Is Us. The first five episodes are masterfully designed, with a focus on one main character each episode. This ensures the extent of the story doesn’t completely overwhelm the viewer, and it allows for some satisfying ‘aHAH’ moments when you start to understand where all the different events link up in each timeline. The slower pacing allows room to delve into each of the characters’ minds on a much deeper level than they might have otherwise.
I’ll admit the first episode, “Steven Sees A Ghost” didn’t hook me – although I’m not sure I gave the episode the chance it deserved. I had heard good things about the show and I wanted something spooky to watch on Halloween, so I gave it a shot. I was pretty distracted at the time and I had to stop watching about three-quarters of the way through the episode. I didn’t feel the need to come back to the show until about a week later. It hadn’t stood out to me as anything all that special, but when I returned to the show I was glad to discover just how wrong I had been. I did rewatch the first episode so I could give it a fair review, and I really enjoyed it on the second viewing. Of course, I now understand more of what was actually going on, which added to the experience. It certainly makes for an interesting hour of television, especially compared to your average pilot – and now that I was paying more attention, I could see that. However, the first episode definitely has an overwhelming amount of characters and detail to keep track of on a first viewing.
In the second episode, “Open Casket,” I started to understand how complex the show really is. The switch in perspectives was a refreshing change. The first episode put Steve at its forefront, but it spent too much time introducing all the other characters for viewers to become particularly invested in him. This episode however, fully zeroed in on oldest daughter, Shirley, finally giving the viewer enough time to get the know one of the characters in detail. I personally wouldn’t find the show half as compelling if it were focusing on one particular child the whole way through; such a large part of the show’s intrigue stems from getting to know each character and their personal experiences with the supernatural. The flashbacks of Shirley’s childhood in episode two were equally intriguing and disturbing, and definitely gave me a taste of the direction the show would be heading. The episode also introduces the idea that the house is like a human being. The children’s mother explains the concept to a young Shirley in detail, creating a sense that it’s not just ghosts stirring up trouble; it might just be the house itself – something a few of the Crain children appear convinced of. Shirley and Steven are certainly the more realistic out of the children, both living fairly regular lives in comparison to the others. The decision to put their episodes first was smart – allowing viewers to gradually ease themselves into the more dramatic supernatural events to come. However, Shirley’s practicality is almost more shocking than the ghosts at times. The scene where she embalms Nell herself still stands out to me as one of the most disturbing scenes in the show so far, but it is also one of the most touching scenes. It paints a perfect picture of Shirley’s strength, sense of overwhelming responsibility, and the tremendous amount she is willing to sacrifice to ensure the best for her family.
The third episode hooked me. “Touch” revolves around Theo, who I found to be the most interesting of the three main characters featured so far. She had the most obvious ‘powers’ of the group, and I tend to enjoy weird/loner kid archetype. I can definitely relate to her deflective self-defence mechanisms, and I have a soft spot for LGBT characters, so I was destined to love her from the start. The episode itself tells a compelling self-contained narrative of Theo using her powers to help one of her patients – another example of the real-life events being somehow more disturbing than the children’s supernatural memories. “Touch” is one of the more emotional episodes of the season so far. You couldn’t help but feel Theo’s pain and grief when she touches Nell’s body. The sheer thought of it would have been enough to disturb me, but Theo’s pained reaction followed by a cut to her drinking her sorrows away sealed the deal. I have to admit, it wasn’t until this episode that I was really able to keep track of all the characters – sue me, I struggled to tell the difference between the four brunette white ladies (and three of their childhood counterparts). It took me a while, but I got there in the end. The episode confirms that the children’s mother has some sort of supernatural ability. In the scene where she gives Theo her gloves, she tells her the women in the family are often ‘sensitive.’ This seems to be setting up more mystery to come surrounding her eventual ‘suicide.’
The fourth episode, “The Twin Thing,” wasn’t the most memorable episode, but it progressed the story well enough and explored a new dimension of the children’s relationships as adults. The episode takes a more realistic turn – mostly focusing on Luke’s journey in rehab. Before watching this episode, all I knew about Luke was that he’s a drug addict. After watching this episode, that’s still all I know about him really, but hey – it was still nice to see his side of the story. At least he’s a nice drug addict who is sincerely trying to do better – and boy has he seen some shit. The man in the bowler hat is my favourite ghost so far. (Yes, I have a favourite ghost). The scene where Luke first sees him is a masterclass in tension manipulation. It had me hooked – absolutely terrified at first, and then laughing out loud out of sheer relief when the ghost took the bowler hat, before reducing me to a state of terror once again when the ghost reached out to him. “The Twin Thing” was a good episode, with a great ending. I just wish it gave more of an indication as to why Luke turned to drugs in the first place. Was he just more affected by his experiences with the supernatural than the others? He doesn’t have Steven’s denial, or Theo’s deflection, or Shirley’s sense of responsibility, so I guess it makes sense that he’d turn to drugs to help him cope, but I’d have still liked to have seen this aspect explored more in the episode itself.
Episode five, “The Bent-Neck Lady” was… really disturbing? Sure, it’s an absolutely incredible episode, but it was also… a lot. I’m an adult and I had nightmares. To be completely honest, I have been half-dreading watching the next episode. That being said, we have already established I scare pretty easy. The episode was especially difficult to watch, knowing how it had to end. Up until this point, there really wasn’t enough information about Nell to have any real emotional attachment to her character, but “The Bent-Neck Lady” changed that. The episode is wonderfully cruel, feeding the viewer with montages of happiness and love in Nell’s life, juxtaposed with her grief and struggles in therapy. The ending, in particular, is truly horrifying. Even though I knew it was coming, Nell’s pure joy at seeing her family and her husband again made the scene more emotional than I could have possibly imagined. It’s definitely the best episode of the show so far – wonderfully shot and edited, and I just couldn’t look away (even when I wanted to). The first four episodes all felt like they were leading up to this one and so I’m not sure what to expect from the show next. I imagine the next big question will be what really happened to their mother.
If you’ve heard of The Haunting of Hill House, you probably don’t need me to tell you it’s amazing. If for some reason you haven’t already seen it, then it’s definitely worth a watch. However, I might warn those who are sensitive to horror and issues surrounding suicide against it, as it can be a lot to handle at times. If you’re looking for cheap thrills, then this isn’t it (although it’s given my poor dogs a fright a few times now.) If you’re looking for a nuanced family drama with a healthy dosage of insidious supernatural mystery, then The Haunting of Hill House is where it’s at.
Alright, review over. On to episode six. Thoughts and prayers would be much appreciated.
I’ll start by saying that I liked this film, but I understand why so many critics didn’t. It’s a matter of pacing; there was simply too much story packed into the one film. It’s a great story that would have made for a great book, but some harsher cuts needed to be made in the editing room if they wanted it to be a great film. General audiences may have felt left behind at times, and the array of new characters would have been overwhelming for those who hadn’t already known they would be there. I know I’ve been watching all the cast interviews and promotional footage I could get my hands on over the past few months, but if you went straight from the first film into the second, I imagine you’d find the shift in scale pretty jarring. I knew what I was getting into but I still had to go back and watch the film a second time before writing this article, and there’s still so much to cover that I’ll probably leave many of my thoughts for more detailed follow-up articles.
I’m a big fan of Harry Potter, and I went into The Crimes of Grindelwald wanting so very much to love it. And, as much as I enjoyed the film, it doesn’t remotely compare to the emotional experience I had whilst watching the first Fantastic Beasts film. The first film was a fairly light-hearted self-contained narrative full to the brim with magic. In comparison, The Crimes of Grindelwald doesn’t feel like a whole entity. It’s too reliant on what’s still to come and it’s not light-hearted or magical enough to be forgiven for it. Similarly, many of my opinions on the decisions made in this film, entirely depend on where they lead in the following films. As a fan, I actually really enjoyed trying to piece together as much information as I could whilst watching. The pacing suited me just fine, but my parents with me struggled (despite being fans themselves.) There were just too many unnecessary subplots using up crucial screen time that was needed elsewhere.
Eddie Redmayne’s Newt was the perfect lovable hero in the first instalment of Fantastic Beasts. Now that the story has taken a turn for the darker, he doesn’t quite fit the feel of the story anymore. It still doesn’t make sense to me why Dumbledore picked Newt of all people for this journey. Apart from a few lines about Dumbledore’s admiration for Newt’s inherent ‘goodness,’ there isn’t enough backstory of their relationship for it to really make sense why Dumbledore sent Newt to New York in the first place. Perhaps if the ‘fantastic beasts’ were still playing a large part in the franchise, I wouldn’t be questioning Newt’s role in it so much. However, this film consistently struggles to balance its focus on its new and exciting magical creatures with its far darker focus on the upcoming war. The war certainly seems to be the franchise’s ongoing focus, and so the audience is left to wonder why there was so much emphasis on Newt and his beasts in the first place.
The highlight of The Crimes of Grindelwald is, without a doubt, Jude Law’s portrayal of the young Albus Dumbledore. He manages to perfectly embody all of Dumbledore’s wit and charm, whilst still retaining Dumbledore’s manipulative and cryptic tendencies. He has the unspoken power and boldness necessary of a man capable of bringing down a wizard like Grindelwald. He also has enough inner conflict, flaws and personal stakes in the situation to be the interesting and complex protagonist that this series needs. What he doesn’t have, however, is enough screen time and backstory (within this instalment of the franchise at least) to live up to the character’s true potential.
Another character suffering from unfulfilled potential is Zoë Kravitz’s Leta Lestrange. Leta had the potential to be a great character, with an interesting personal stake in events, and a close history with our main character. She’s also one of few positive depictions of Slytherins that we’ve seen in the Harry Potter Universe, but her character arc was far too rushed for the audience to establish any real connection with her. The sibling drama was one plot twist too many in my opinion, and Leta would have made a far more compelling character if she had been given time to explore her relationships with Newt and Theseus in more depth. We see small snippets of Newt and Leta at Hogwarts, yet we are given little indication of how the two grew apart or the extent of their current relationship – let alone any indication of how Leta and Theseus came to be involved. I know I would have liked to see more exploration of her character in the future, as she is one of the few compellingly multifaceted characters the franchise has to offer.
The character that surprised me most this film was Queenie. In the past, she has been insistently curious, naive at times and notably excited by the prospect of breaking the law, which actually sets her up perfectly for her arc in The Crimes of Grindelwald – I just wasn’t expecting it. I’ll admit I was initially confused by her willingness to manipulate Jacob, but I suppose it does make sense, given her history of using her powers to manipulate others. This also foreshadowed the possibility of Queenie finding herself on the opposing side of the conflicts to come. Queenie’s sympathies for the ‘dark side’ demonstrated Grindelwald’s aptitude for manipulation, also setting up Queenie for a complex character arc to come in future films. I am keen to see play out, as it may finally give our main characters a personal stake in the conflict. Whilst I was pleasantly surprised with Queenie’s journey throughout this film, I can’t help but feel that many of the other characters could have been put to better use.
I won’t get too deep into the Nagini debate, but she did feel like a fairly random addition to the film. She didn’t really… do much? I still can’t tell if she was there because she actually plays a part in the upcoming story, or if she was just there to say ‘look! Nagini used to be a woman! Surprise!’. Even she does play more of a part in future films, presumably to help break through to Credence, then they really needed to spend more time developing that relationship. As far as I can tell, Nagini’s part in this film doesn’t seem worth the drama. I’m still curious to know how she ended up serving Voldemort, and I can only hope that the next few films will give her an interesting story arc that somehow points her in that direction. Given how pressed they were for screen time in The Crimes of Grindelwald, it probably could have done without her. The same sadly goes for Nicolas Flamel. As much as it was fun to see him, he wasn’t a necessary addition to the film and his screen time could have definitely been allocated elsewhere.
The few breaks in The Crimes of Grindelwald’s non-stop action were usually devoted to an unnecessary side plot or a moment played off for laughs. What this film lacked was an emotional connection to its characters, and this could have been developed through some poignant moments of reflection – preferably from some of the newer additions to the crew like Dumbledore, Leta or even Theseus. The film could have also benefited from fleshing out the Dumbledore/Grindelwald connection, especially from Grindelwald’s side of the equation. For a film with his name in the title, we hardly delved into Grindelwald’s mindset and motivations at all. Fans of the original Potter books may already know his story, but there really should have been a more concrete depiction of exactly what he was rallying for, so that the casual viewers could keep up. If they don’t understand exactly what the protagonists are fighting against, why should they be invested in the film at all? I’m guessing we’ll see more of the Dumbledore/Grindelwald backstory in the next film when they attempt to destroy the blood pact (which really needed more explanation in this film, considering how much the film revolved around it).
All in all, there were too many decisions I can’t wholly judge yet because I’m still waiting to see if there’s a payoff in the later films. If they wanted The Crimes of Grindelwald to be received as a successful self-contained narrative, there needed to be more payoff and explanation for these decisions within this instalment of the franchise, instead of all the unnecessary side plots that just distracted from the essence of the film.
Pete Gardner and Rachel Bloom in Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (2015-)
This was one of the season’s best episodes yet. Its genius stemmed from its simplicity, pairing off the main characters in combinations that we wouldn’t normally see. We follow the pairings attempts to complete fairly mundane tasks (some more willing than others) and they start to open up to each other along the way. The unexpected combination of characters gives them all a fresh perspective to their troubles, allowing them to progress in ways that they might not have otherwise.
But before I get into all that, let’s talk about the music. The episode’s first song, “Trapped in a Car with Someone You Don’t Want to be Trapped in a Car With,” is an upbeat Beach Boys-style number that’s as brilliant as its title suggests. It’s up there with “No One Else is Singing My Song” and “Don’t Be A Lawyer” as my favourite songs of the season so far. Somehow, equating a never-ending car ride to the gradual death of a boy band’s career actually worked…like really well? I’m not sure I would have believed it if I hadn’t just seen it with my own eyes.
The second song, “Farewell, Fair Moustache” was short and sweet, and it gave Darryl’s moustache the send-off it deserved. (Yes, I’m quite serious.) It wasn’t a fully produced musical number like we’re used to seeing on the show and that’s probably just a result of the show’s tight budget, but they pulled it off well. The song’s simplicity and sombreness seemed oddly fitting and just added to the scene’s humour.
I’ll admit I was a little conflicted about Darryl this episode. I can understand why Rebecca was so upset with him; he was doing what she had repeatedly asked him not to do, which anyone would find frustrating. That being said, her reaction was cruel and self-centered. Rebecca has a history of being quite dismissive of Darryl and I liked that he stood up for himself. He rarely gets taken seriously on the show, which makes the moments where he does stand up for himself all the more powerful. The scene in season 3, for example, where Darryl tells White Josh that he is a catch and should be treated as such; it still sticks out in my mind as a stand out Darryl scene, and it’s the same Darryl that we see in this episode. Darryl’s refusal to put up with Rebecca’s hurtful comments forces her to take him seriously. It also makes Rebecca confront her habit of quickly reverting to cruelty when frustrated. It was touching to see these two admit to their mistakes and move forward with a new-found respect for one another.
The pair that surprised me the most this episode was Heather and Nathaniel. They may not like each other, but they certainly made for an entertaining combo. Heather calling out Nathaniel was something I needed to see – I think we all did. Progress with Nathaniel has been slow, to say the least. There’s only so many times you can see a guy have a meltdown, repress his feelings and immediately revert back to being an asshole again before you’ve had enough. I don’t hate Nathaniel; he’s had some really great moments on the show. I just wish he’d had more real character development along the way. I suppose the lesson is that some assholes just stay assholes, no matter how sad their childhood was. Still, I couldn’t help but become frustrated with Nathaniel’s refusal to change – up until this episode.
Turns out he just needed someone like Heather to hit him with a few truth bombs and put him in his place. She seemed to break through to him in this episode, which gives me hope that we might see more significant growth in Nathaniel’s character in the near future. The scene at the end where Nathaniel kisses Bert’s forehead was both parts hilarious and actually quite telling – Nathaniel is willing to go out of his comfort zone and do something he has little to no experience with, all in an effort to be a kinder person. Hopefully, this is the start of a real redemption ark for Nathaniel – or at least the start of him going to therapy and actually trying to change in some way for the better.
In turn, Nathaniel helped Heather realise she didn’t need to settle for her barely-functioning car anymore. With a respectable job and steady income, Heather doesn’t need to live like a broke college student anymore. Nathaniel may have been rude in the way he communicated this to her, but he ultimately made Heather realise that she deserves better for herself. I’d say that’s still a worthwhile contribution. It’s not the biggest change, but it’s another important step in Heather’s journey to taking herself seriously and giving adulthood a chance.
The last unusual pairing of characters was Josh and Paula. The two have been major characters from the start, but they’ve somehow managed to avoid each other for the majority of that time. They weren’t the major focus of the episode, but they actually made a surprisingly good pair. Paula has a knack for brutal honesty that Josh needed to hear, and Josh is surprisingly caring and observant, as Rebecca pointed out a few episodes ago. He quickly pinpointed exactly what was troubling Paula and presented it to her as a straightforward fact, making it impossible for her to deny. If only we all had a Josh Chan to help us with our troubles… I think I’m starting to see why Rebecca was so crazy about him. (Although, I suppose he’s been through extensive therapy since then. It’s certainly made a difference.)
Paula may have given Josh enough of a push to move out of Hector’s mum’s house finally and I’m interested to see where he’ll go next. We know Rebecca’s just lost a roommate… I’d actually love to see more of Josh and Rebecca bonding after everything they’ve been through together, so maybe that could be an interesting route to take – albeit potentially awkward. Paula, on the other hand, needs to stop procrastinating and fully commit to her decision to become a full-fledged lawyer. She also needs to be nicer to her family. We’ve seen some development of Paula’s relationship with her sons over the past few weeks, but she still has a long way to go. Guilting her husband into agreeing with her by bringing up Tanya at any given chance probably isn’t the healthiest thing either. Maybe she should take a leaf out of Josh’s book and give therapy a try?
Speaking of therapy, I couldn’t help but notice this episode that Rebecca, Josh and Bert all seem to have a habit of oversharing. They just happen to be the characters who go to regular therapy sessions. I picked up on this because it’s something I do too sometimes. Therapy has helped me grow more comfortable with talking about my problems and it’s trained me to try to work through a lot of my unhealthy thoughts and habits as they happen – which often leads to me blurting out my thoughts to whoever is around if I’m feeling overwhelmed. Therefore, it makes sense to me that the characters who are more in touch with their feelings are also the ones that tend to overshare. I don’t know if this pattern was a conscious choice, but I’d definitely like to see some of these characters realise that what they’re doing can be unhealthy. Rebecca, especially, has always been self-centered, often imparting an unfair amount of emotional burden on the people around her, without offering much support in return (currently AJ, but often Heather in the past). I’d love to see her recognise this and learn when it’s appropriate and necessary to share personal information about herself.
The other major talking point of the episode is that Rebecca has decided to start dating again. Romantic relationships are something that she has continually struggled with throughout the show, so it will certainly be interesting to see her attempt this again with a healthier mindset. She may not need a relationship to be happy, but she shouldn’t be afraid of it either. As Dr Akopian said, Rebecca’s a loving person who deserves love, and I hope we’ll see her find that.